AT&T Agree To Pay Back $80 Million For Unauthorized 'Mobile Cramming' Charges

It was reported this morning that the UK mobile carrier Three was fined £250,000 by Ofcom for the way in which it has dealt with customer complaints in the past. Well, it seems it is not only the UK carriers who have been behaving badly. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have this morning announced that AT&T have agreed to pay $80 million in customer refunds for unauthorized third party charges. The overall amount actually to be paid by AT&T totals $105 million. Which includes in addition to the original $80 million, a further $20 million in penalties (to be paid to the 50 states and the District of Columbia). Along with a $5 million penalty to be paid directly to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The complaint against AT&T refers to allegations made by the FTC in respect to charges of "hundreds of millions of dollars" AT&T billed to its customers as add-on charges to their monthly bill. A process commonly referred to as 'mobile cramming'. These unauthorized charges typical consisted of a $9.99 per month billing charge and would have been for subscriptions to ringtones, text messages, love tips, horoscopes or fun facts. Although AT&T were accused of billing hundreds-of-millions the majority of those fees would have gone to the third party companies with the FTC claiming AT&T typically kept 35% of the amounts billed. This is probably why the $80 million fine is less than the amount AT&T was accused of billing. It's worth noting that is not only AT&T accused of the practise of mobile cramming with the FTC reporting this is the seventh mobile cramming case since 2013. In particular a case against T-Mobile was launched in July although this is still ongoing. To highlight how widespread the problem was the FTC state that AT&T received over 1.3 million customer complaint calls about the charges in 2011 alone. What makes this worse is that AT&T originally were only offering customers (who complained) a refund of only the last three months charges (irrespective of how long they had been billed). To add further insult in October 2011 AT&T changed their refund policy and since then was only offering refunds for the last two months.

From today customers who believe they may have been charged for the type of subscription based content described (without their consent) can submit a claim for a refund. If you think you have been charged in this way then follow the link for the submit form. The image below (provided by the FTC) shows an example (real) bill and how the charges would have looked on your bill if you were charged. Anyone think (or know) that they have been charged by AT&T for these subscription based charges?

Copyright ©2019 Android Headlines. All Rights Reserved
This post may contain affiliate links. See our privacy policy for more information.
You May Like These
More Like This:
About the Author

John Anon

John has been writing about and reviewing tech products since 2014 after making the transition from writing about and reviewing airlines. With a background in Psychology, John has a particular interest in the science and future of the industry. Besides adopting the Managing Editor role at AH John also covers much of the news surrounding audio and visual tech, including cord-cutting, the state of Pay-TV, and Android TV. Contact him at [email protected]
Android Headlines We Are Hiring Apply Now