Why Google Controlling and Standardizing Android Is Great News for End-Users

| October 21, 2013 | 9 Replies

Nexus 5

This morning I read a post from ArsTechnica, by Ron Amadeo, called Google’s Iron Grip on Android, and as you can imagine, both the title and the article themselves are trying to make a case that this is a bad thing. The question is – from which perspective? Everything has a positive side and a downside, but you have to consider whether the positives outweigh the negatives. In this case, I think they do, especially for end-users.

Positives

This is actually what us, the end users, have been wanting for a long time – a tightly controlled ecosystem, that can deliver us the experience we want, without carrier, or even OEM interference. Think about it – without such tight control, we’ll never be able to get updates from Google for all devices. In order for Google to even begin to do that in the future, all OEM’s will have to relinquish control to Google, and listen to what they are requiring of them, in order to standardize hardware and software across devices, and make it easier to be updated.

Right now, there are so many changes to the core of Android that most OEM’s do, that it would be impossible for Google to do that. Android will never be as good as Windows, in terms of having a similar, recognizable interface  (well, pre-Windows 8 at least), and in terms of receiving updates for thousands of different hardware configurations.

We don’t even need to go to Microsoft’s camp to see what a tightly controlled experience means. We can see that with ChromeOS and Chromebooks, too. Because Google has full control of Chrome (not Chromium, the open source project), and because nobody else can modify ChromeOS but Google, we get the same ChromeOS experience across all Chromebooks, and the best part, which I love, is receiving updates from Google every 6 weeks or so, across all Chromebooks.

That’s amazing. Can you imagine how good that would be if Google could do the same thing for Android, too, and across all devices? But if you want to see that, then you need to be supportive of Google’s move to control Android more tightly, in order to create a standardized experience and an update system that works for all devices.

The only thing that can stop this is user backlash and OEM backlash, but I think Google can deal with the OEM’s one way or another. For example, even if they don’t agree from day one to letting Google do all of this, Google can try modularize Android, as they’ve already done so far, in small ways, until most people get updates for the parts of Android they use most, from Google. But in the end, whether Google does this or not, or how fast they’re doing it, really depends on how the users respond to it.

Downsides

So what are the downsides? First off, obviously OEM’s won’t be thrilled with this, but let’s face it, more times than not, they are ruining the experience instead of making it better. Plus, the fact that carriers can still have influence at least on how updates are done, is just unacceptable to me.

But OEM’s agree to this, willingly or not, depending on their deals with carriers, and because they are split into multiple companies, and don’t have the power of one large company behind all Android devices, like Google could have. If Google controls the whole Android ecosystem, and for devices in so many countries, it’s going to be a lot harder for carriers like Verizon or AT&T to demand that they get “special treatment”.

Then there’s the open source community, and I empathize with them, if Google decides to control Android more. But if you’ve been paying attention, the developers behind CyanogenMOD, AOKP or OmniROM, have already started replacing Google’s proprietary apps with their own. A lot of ROM users, though, use ROM’s only because they can still sideload Google’s apps to them.

That being said, I do support the idea of having fully open source ROMs for as many phones as possible, just in case Google starts abusing that power and control of Android in the future, by say letting NSA get control of many devices, or letting the US government shut down people’s phones during a protest, like the UK government demanded RIM to turn off BBM a while ago. So just in case that sort of crazy things start to happen, then I do want a fully open source and “free” (as in freedom) OS for my smartphone to exist.

However, until that happens, Google trying to standardize the Android ecosystem, so we can eventually all have not just a great “Google experience”, but also receive updates straight from Google, early and often, just like we see on ChromeOS, Windows, Mac OS X and iOS, is absolutely the best thing that can happen for us, the end-users.

Category: Android News

About Lucian Armasu ()

Lucian is passionate about writing about different technologies, talking about their potential, and predicting tech trends. Visit his technology news website at TechDomino.com.
  • +BILL RAMSEYER

    Well put

  • nihir

    You have the author’s name of the Ars article misspelled. Although Ron Amadeus may be more interesting, his last name is actually Amadeo.

  • Anthony

    Everyone is welcome to their own opinion, but I disagree with you on this. Tighting the grip would change android completely. It sounds good in theory. However the reality is that android would no longer be android as we know it. It would turn into “ios google”. Yes there would be positives, but I think the negatives would outweigh them.

    • Juice

      You need to explain why you should be a little bit more than happy to be a part ofa new job and the rest of my own personal information is not an option to purchase the Groupon is is a good time to do is make sure that the company and I will be home for a a few days later I have been the most part of the experience of the most theatrical shooters the most important displays of a new job and a half hours of operation are not you will be in the morning and then the rest of my favorite things to be a part of my favorite things to be a part of my favorite things to be a part of my favorite things to that of the best most

  • http://www.androidpolice.com/author/ron-amadeo/ Ron Amadeo

    No, I’m not trying to make the case that this is bad. It’s only bad if you think Google’s control is a bad thing. It sucks for people trying to fork Android, but I never said it was bad for the end user.

    • Grimmjow

      You didn’t explicitly mention it but you did take sides. The headline, the overall tone, the crying Android and the elevated comment “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish”.

  • David Wood

    The ArsTechnica article is looking at it from the wrong perspective. This article is great. Google taking back control of the experience is a great thing, it means that no longer are devices plagued by carrier bloatware, it’s all stock (which, in my opinion, is far better than carrier alternatives). Despite being bad for the AOSP, this doesn’t mean you have to use Google products and nothing else, there is still a huge selection of alternative apps out there on the store.

  • Jachym Kokesh Lukes

    I would call myself Android fanboy. I have phones since Eclair times. Every phone I got ran Cyanogenmod since the day 1. I don’t like controlled environments like iOS is, but last week I got iPhone 5 at work (other choice was WinMo, go figure). I hate how I can’t switch keyboard, I hate that everybody’s screen looks the same. But the thing is: if iFruit decides to release update, they do it and everybody eligible gets it. My current phone is Samsung Galaxy S2. All the updates which came out for the phone took too long to get (thank god I am not on stock), millions of promises to release sources for the development community to be able to maintain independent ROMs.
    I don’t want Google to make Android so f’n tight as iOS, but if there is some general feeling of support, not relying on companies like Samsung, it would be nice. My S2 is very well capable of running latest 4.3.1 Cyanogenmod, but it is crippled by need to find hacks, use “drivers” from other Samsung devices which are compatible and gt some later update, etc. Currently all “our” devs are gone, tired of finding ways to make this still quite good phone work after each new version of OS is released. If you take stock Galaxy S2, the UI look like something from 4 years ago.
    So yes, I would like Google to take a little bit more control.

  • beatles

    samsung don’t like their own sales more spam gadgets on the way, put out your Tizen crap sung